<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Remoting, XML, AMF, Hessian and Deflate algorithm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cornelcreanga.com/2009/02/remoting-xml-amf-hessian-and-deflate-algorithm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cornelcreanga.com/2009/02/remoting-xml-amf-hessian-and-deflate-algorithm/</link>
	<description>Random thoughts about software development.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:37:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Setting up a Seam (EAR) / Flex project with Flamingo</title>
		<link>http://cornelcreanga.com/2009/02/remoting-xml-amf-hessian-and-deflate-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-30875</link>
		<dc:creator>Setting up a Seam (EAR) / Flex project with Flamingo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 05:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cornelcreanga.com/?p=69#comment-30875</guid>
		<description>[...] You could also choose the „hessian-3.1.3.jar“ instead the „amf-serializer-2.2.jar“ if you would want to use the Hessian-Protocol instead of AMF. I prefer AMF. Checkout this post: http://cornelcreanga.com/2009/02/remoting-xml-amf-hessian-and-deflate-algorithm/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You could also choose the „hessian-3.1.3.jar“ instead the „amf-serializer-2.2.jar“ if you would want to use the Hessian-Protocol instead of AMF. I prefer AMF. Checkout this post: <a href="http://cornelcreanga.com/2009/02/remoting-xml-amf-hessian-and-deflate-algorithm/" rel="nofollow">http://cornelcreanga.com/2009/02/remoting-xml-amf-hessian-and-deflate-algorithm/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cornel Creanga &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Java serialization versus AMF/Hessian serialization</title>
		<link>http://cornelcreanga.com/2009/02/remoting-xml-amf-hessian-and-deflate-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-11500</link>
		<dc:creator>Cornel Creanga &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Java serialization versus AMF/Hessian serialization</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 09:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cornelcreanga.com/?p=69#comment-11500</guid>
		<description>[...] never thought about it and I did nor performed any tests. Now I extended my mini-benchmark from my previous post and I also serialized the objects using Java serialization. The results are below, and you can see [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] never thought about it and I did nor performed any tests. Now I extended my mini-benchmark from my previous post and I also serialized the objects using Java serialization. The results are below, and you can see [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cornel Creanga &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Using Hessian and Flash player</title>
		<link>http://cornelcreanga.com/2009/02/remoting-xml-amf-hessian-and-deflate-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-7116</link>
		<dc:creator>Cornel Creanga &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Using Hessian and Flash player</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cornelcreanga.com/?p=69#comment-7116</guid>
		<description>[...] I wrote in a previous post Hessian serialization from the server side is faster than the AMF one, and the compressed data [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I wrote in a previous post Hessian serialization from the server side is faster than the AMF one, and the compressed data [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cornel</title>
		<link>http://cornelcreanga.com/2009/02/remoting-xml-amf-hessian-and-deflate-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-7032</link>
		<dc:creator>cornel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 11:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cornelcreanga.com/?p=69#comment-7032</guid>
		<description>The client parsing time is faster for AMF (as is expected, it&#039;s a native feature from Flash Player compared with the hessian case where you have an external library) but I do not have the exact times. I also think that the most important things are the server time and bandwith savings, at least for most applications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The client parsing time is faster for AMF (as is expected, it&#8217;s a native feature from Flash Player compared with the hessian case where you have an external library) but I do not have the exact times. I also think that the most important things are the server time and bandwith savings, at least for most applications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Ward</title>
		<link>http://cornelcreanga.com/2009/02/remoting-xml-amf-hessian-and-deflate-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-6919</link>
		<dc:creator>James Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cornelcreanga.com/?p=69#comment-6919</guid>
		<description>Interesting stats.  How does client side parse time differ between AMF and Hessian?

-James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting stats.  How does client side parse time differ between AMF and Hessian?</p>
<p>-James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

